Sunday, March 23, 2014

Contemporary Issues- Beyonce

Love her or hate her, there is no denying the woman works hard! Beyonce is an international music icon. To add to her list of record-breaking achievements, this past New Year's Eve she released an entire album over night through iTunes. No one knew. 17 complete videos and no one knew. It is an incredible feat in today's age of instant communication and lack of anonymity. Beyonce has been taken to task and deeply criticized for how sexually explicit the album is.  I've read a few articles and reviews; finding a common theme in the comments to be that she is the Black version of Madonna. But it goes deeper because of our history of stereotypes portraying Black women to behave in overtly promiscuous, a-moral ways. Does Bey's music feed those images? Or does her music empower all women to be confident in their sexuality?

http://www.npr.org/blogs/therecord/2014/03/17/258155902/how-sweet-it-is-to-be-loved-by-you-the-beyhive

Now that she is back on the road, now that the Internet is again awash in pictures of her sweating on stage in Glasgow, running through sold-out crowds in London in costume, it seems as good a time as any to talk about what for many young women was the most important big live show of the past two years — Beyoncé's "The Mrs. Carter Show World Tour." And because Beyoncé has been on the road since last April, almost an entire year, there has been ample time for the constellation of the fans who pay serious money to follow her to create a fan culture (much like The Grateful Dead and their Deadheads but updated for the 21st century) that is almost as intriguing as the star herself.
Barclays Stadium might be an athletic venue, but for the four nights that Beyoncé Giselle Knowles-Carter performed there last summer, it became a coliseum of glitter, sequins and gold lamé. Justin Bieber calls his fans Beliebers, Lady Gaga calls hers the Little Monsters, and Beyoncé calls her most hardcore fans the "BeyHive." As they clogged and crammed Atlantic Avenue, all trying to get to their Queen, the description never seemed more accurate.
Not everyone at the concert was a woman, and not everyone was bedazzled, but it was pretty remarkable how many of them were. At a Beyoncé concert are swarms, literally swarms, of women. There are some men there too, of course, but the women, and by this I mean every kind of woman you can imagine, they come invincible. They stride four abreast. They henpeck and flirt with the guards. They twerk in front of food kiosks while they wait in line to order snacks. They wear their best outfits — baggy vests and baseball caps, to dresses tight enough to look like bondage. They feel it. A Beyoncé concert is like one epic Beyoncé video. One can't help but get into the fantasy. It is about the community. And even though it was a hot night in the city, inside Barclays the women were being nothing short of congenial. In the elevator going down to another level, I danced with two supersassy Delta sorors to "Blurred Lines" as it played over the loudspeaker. They high-fived me when we exited. In another concourse, I watched a rambunctious group of blonde women in six-inch heels buy shots and eat huge hamburgers under unforgiving stadium lighting, totally not giving a f- - - about their appetites or their table manners because at a Beyoncé concert absolutely none of that matters. If you wanted to evade security and crash a section that was closer to the stage, it was all good. If you couldn't make up your mind about whether you wanted that really expensive T-shirt with a half-naked, bent-over Beyoncé emblazoned on its front, you could take your time because chances were the person behind you was giddy with the same excitement and indecision too. There was no judgment, because a Beyoncé concert is a world run totally by girls, and by that I mean women.
At this point, you don't have to be a Beyoncé fan to acknowledge that Beyoncé Knowles-Carter, age 32, is the clear contender for the title of the hardest working woman in pop music. I was not left particularly breathless by her Super Bowl show, nor did I race to see it. I own only one of her albums, the one I think is her best until her most recent, B'Day, but over the years, ever since a friend gave me a pass to attend her intimate Roseland show in 2011 where backstage I watched a breathless, drenched Beyonce walk off stage like it was nothing, I've been forced to concede that, love her or not, there can be little doubt that Beyoncé is a behemoth of work ethic and sweat in nude salsa-dancer tights. She is the sort of woman who in between a 132-date world tour found time to record an entire album in absolute secret, film 17 music videos, and organize it all through her own fledgling company, Parkwood Entertainment, instead of her established record label, Columbia Records.
Over the years, Beyoncé has razored off friends and group members who slowed her down. She has become a dancer, a wife and a mother. And of late, Beyoncé has become a cultural lightning rod whose obsessive fans tell us loads about how conversations around sexuality and race still pervade American pop music. People care about Beyoncé for the same reason Camille Paglia and bell hooks cared about Madonna. If Madonna exemplified white female sexuality and independence coming into its own, Beyoncé shows her fans what it means for a black woman to put on the performance of a lifetime.
Like all superfans, the BeyHive to some extent thrives off the sense that their bond to the object of their affection is intimate and specific even when it is not. What is specific with someone like Beyoncé, the now equal-earning, if not out-earning, wife of a man worth a half-billion dollars, who obtained that money with her own blood, sweat and tears as a teenager in a girl group, and later out-Svengali-ed her looming, impresario father, broke off and eclipsed her groupmates to become one of the world's most top-selling solo artists, is that her fans feel like they have been there for her success. They are proud of her. They have watched her grow up and watched her win. Beyoncé's totemic status with the BeyHive is legendary. The Hive is fiercely protective of its Queen Bee. Besides Beyoncé's concerts, the foremost apiary of the BeyHive is on the Internet, on Twitter. On Twitter, you can find the Hive massive and worldwide: the bugged out French teenagers, the Brazilians tweeting from Rio, the white boys in the Midwest with Broadway dreams, connected by their love of Beyoncé, all speaking in a lexicon that makes them sound like both the forefront of the beekeeping movement and the ultimate Beyoncé fans. If you insult Beyoncé on Twitter, the Hive will insult you until you rue the day you were born, or regret the day you canceled your gym membership.
After following one Hive member's Twitter feed for hours (and discerning that she lives in the Deep South and is married despite being very young, and that she mostly tweets about three things: going to the casino, Beyoncé's sales numbers and fighting with her husband for more money to feed her Beyoncé habit), I timidly sent her a message over Twitter: "Can I ask you a question?"
I was timid because her timeline revealed that she had spent her morning trying to get a Best Buy employee fired because he slipped her a link to download the album for free. This infuriated her. How will Beyoncé outsell Taylor Swift, Katy Perry and the "competition" with people like this, she wondered. Sometime the next day, she (I'll call her "Angela") followed me back. Angela wrote that she was down to talk with me about being a part of The BeyHive but with one condition: It had to be positive. She said she was all about positivity — something that seemed mildly ironic since for the last 48 hours she had made light of Rihanna for being a victim of domestic violence, mocked Taylor Swift's flat ass and dissed anyone who admitted they were a fan of Tamar Braxton.
But as we corresponded back and forth, I watched her tweets take a kinder tone, so I agreed to her request and asked for her phone number. She wrote back that her phone was dying. So without thinking I sent her my number and told her to call me. When an hour passed without reply, I sent her another note, and I got a reply that revealed the tone had clearly changed. Angela was now highly pissed. "Who are you? Are you pulling my leg?" She wanted to know why'd I want to interview her. I wrote back and explained I'm a writer. Before I could finish she sent me another note: "I'm blocking you." Her anger was almost palpable. I sent her a link to my work, and a few minutes passed. No reply, but when I checked her timeline again, I almost passed out. She had taken my information and posted a screenshot of it to all of her followers — not just her followers, but also the entire BeyHive, because she had captioned her tweets with that hashtag: #BEYHIVE
Of late, the Hive has gotten a bad name; everybody knows that they have a reputation for stunts like this. But what seemed less obvious, at least to me, was why they took their love affair with Beyoncé so seriously and exerted so much effort and so much venom in its defense.
Back at Barclays, this time months later, I stood outside, in the winter, at Beyoncé's last show in Brooklyn and tried to get some of her fans to talk with me. I started with groups. People with "go-for-it" Beyoncé-like style. High heels. Studded loafers. Fur vests. Red talons. I approached one group of young ladies with Lady Godiva-long weaves and asked them if they would answer a few questions for a piece I'm working on.
"No, boo, no questions," their "leader" said, holding her phone to her face like I was paparazzi. "We are late for the show."
She herded her girls along. It didn't matter that we both knew the show didn't start for an hour. TMZ taught her well. After a few attempts like this, I gave up and decided to try the only people who couldn't walk away from me: the security guards. At the least crowded entrance door I asked a guard, "What sort of fan comes to the Beyoncé show?" This guard, a middle-aged black woman, looked around furtively, and then she pointed to herself and then back to me without saying a word.
"Mostly black girls?" I inferred and whispered it back to her.
"Oh, yeah," she said. She had a heavy Caribbean accent. Then her face got grave and she nodded, like the answer was apparent but also a secret. "It's a mixture, yeah, but, yeah, it's mostly us here."
When I tried to verify this assessment of the crowd with another guard, who was also a middle-aged black woman, she balked, "Are you kidding me?" She laughed proudly. "Oh no! No way! No way! White people love Beyoncé. The gay guys? Please! Beyoncé? She is international." She would not stop laughing, and before I could ask her something else, she walked away still scoffing at me and shaking her head.
I had the best luck with a young guy guard, who caught my eye because he was beaming like he had the best job in the world, and for that night maybe he did. He really didn't want to talk. He was distracted, involved in doing his "job," watching the crowd of women closely, but he tried his best to answer me.
Is the Hive mostly black girls? He repeated the question. "Man, the crowd is all sorts of people, look around," he said. And he was right. To our left there was a vent of passengers pouring from the LIRR subway station with hordes of bridge and tunnel middle-aged moms and white girls in Uggs.
"See, there are all sorts," he said confidently, and then he smiled, revealing a large chipped tooth. "The black girls, though? They just dress up, they get way, way more into it, so they stand out more. Because they take it seriously."
It is true: There are all sorts of Hive members. But to me the ones with the best language, the ones whose Twitter feeds I couldn't stop reading, were the black girls. What is interesting is that they are also a part of the demographic of black women who are now also being taken to task and called empty, subjective words like "toxic," for their use and approbation of a technological space that is supposed to be open to all: Black Twitter. But the Hive, to some extent, and Black Twitter at large, is what happens when you don't have real access to mainstream media, when there are so few black icons who speak to the realities of black life, and when last year (for the first time ever in Billboard's history) no black artist had a No. 1 hit song. It is no wonder then that so many young women and men of color, indeed, take it moreseriously.
On the day the Hive will never forget, the Beyoncé album's release day, I was in Chicago. I had longstanding plans to review Beyoncé's concert that night at the home of the Bulls, United Center. It was bitterly cold. Before I went to the concert I checked Twitter, and there one Hive member, a young black girl, was tweeting joyfully about having tickets to the concert that night. Intermixed with her joy was anger. She said she couldn't believe her family would "f- - - her over" like this. She had been kicked out of her home by an aunt. Later she would complain about the cold in Chicago. She was a college student who often tweeted maudlin to heartbreaking tweets about struggling all her life and going "Christmas shopping with no money." That night it was below freezing in Chicago. When my sister and I stood outside and waited for our cab it was so cold I wanted to cry. Once inside United Center, as we waited for the show to start, I asked people questions: How much were their tickets? The girls beside us had spent $500. When I watched the Hive on Twitter, the only time they risked treason of their Queen was to complain about the high cost of showing their love. Didn't she realize how expensive it was becoming to be devoted? Now, in retrospect, I realize somewhere in that crowd of thousands of people there was a girl without a home in the middle of winter to whom tickets to Beyoncé meant the entire world.
In Life Is But a Dream, Beyoncé's film-length selfie/documentary, she leaps into the waters of the South of France and shows off her voluminous wedding dress. At one point we are shown a still-sexy silhouette of her pregnant belly — causing Beyoncé to lament that she can't understand how someone could ever believe that she and Jay Z used a surrogate to have their child. Where did they come up with this? She asks incredulously. These rumors, these crazy legends, these stories? But Beyoncé's parents are from that same pit of the American South that birthed not just the ragging rhythms and 2/4 meter her band interpolates into the finale of the Mrs. Carter show but also the most magical realism this country has ever seen. Beyoncé, who claims her Southern Creole heritage big time, must know that men and women like her mother and father come from a people who tell stories, people who dream big, hope huge and often invoke the devil or the supernatural as explanations for things outside their grasp or their understanding of reality. The thing Beyoncé doesn't understand about all of the rumors surrounding her is that in the great tradition of that kind of storytelling, the thing beyond our grasp and most people's realities is her. Beyoncé, either out of naïveté or innocence, is the last to accept what most people think — that she is not like us.
In her video for "Partition" Beyoncé slithers around her husband, a man who proves talent wins everything and capitalism can buy all if one accepts the blindfold it comes with, and she looks fantastic. In bell hooks' essay "Selling Hot Pussy," hooks writes about Tina Turner's long, blond wig and her hot-to-trot savage sexuality as an inversion of "old imagery" to "place herself in the role of the dominator." But as right as hooks is, about the blond hair and everything else, for an hour or so it is nice to watch Beyoncé's visual album and consider the pleasure of a black woman who is able to express her sexuality without being called a ho, a video girl, a freak, a gold-digger or words worse. She can do what most of us cannot.
In 2011, a study released by the Violence Policy Center revealed that black women were murdered by men "at a rate of 2.61 per 100,000 in single victim/single offender incidents," whereas with white women, the rate was 0.99 per 100,000. This seems like a slight difference but not when the popular perception of black women and girls is that they are antagonistic, "toxic," tough, brassy and impossible to hurt.
Pop music, like most things in America, has an especially hard time with black women and their bodies, from Miley Cyrus' use of them in her tired Jump Jim Crow antics to the condemnation of Rihanna's wonderful wild. Rihanna is a popular target for the BeyHive, a person they often humiliate, maybe just because she is another big-deal black girl in pop music. Almost daily they post pictures of her beaten, swollen bruised face after Chris Brown's vicious attack. It is gross and unforgivable, and something that could be reined in if Beyoncé actually communicated with her Hive regularly (she does not). But of late I've come to think that it speaks to something important about the BeyHive: I'm not certain they really hate Rihanna, or find joy in her hurt — instead I think what they really hate is that Rihanna knows firsthand, like so many women and girls, and perhaps like so many of them, that being violently hit by a man doesn't ever feel like a kiss. It feels the opposite. It is a humiliation that is impossible to forget. So what I think the Hive hates about Rihanna is that there is no fun, no fantasy in that kind of knowledge of womanhood, just a reflection of the real but all-too-often silent life they too must wade through as young women of color in America.
And then there is Beyoncé. Who, like most black women, must work hard but, unlike most black women and girls, is endlessly well-defended. She will never be homeless. She will never be broken. She has no discernible dirty laundry. While her fans' lives might be pocked with disappointments and failures, somehow their Queen's life has largely avoided this. There are people who like to say hyperbolic, vapid things like, if you hate Beyoncé you must hate your life. Beyoncé is such a symbol of triumph that these people are willing to overlook her extremely problematic ties to the worst forms of capitalism (Pepsi, Wal-Mart and Barneys). But recently I've come to realize how much the Hive's deep, at times blind investment in her isn't so much about loving her one ton of talent but rather their defense of her place on the pedestal. They are in love with what she transmutes. What she is allowed to be. And Beyoncé does this more earnestly than the majority of singers today: she performs for them, shows them what a woman in successful control of her life sounds like. This is why they root for her. She gives her fans hope — as Tina Turner once did for women in the '80s — a sense that they, too, might win at life and vanquish the hurt. Beyoncé is the rare exception who has beaten the odds, despite her being a woman, and despite her being a black woman.
A few days after Beyoncé's album came out I was invited to join more than 40 women in a conference call about the album. Did I come in love? Adrienne Maree Brown, the facilitator of the call, asked me when I revealed I was on assignment. I replied that I came in sisterhood. Which is the word that kept circling in my head as I listened, almost awed into silence by these women, many of them women of color, who just wanted to be rapturous over the black woman who almost shut down Christmas. For one hour all that these women wanted was a private space to say "Beyoncé is my sister and I love her."
Is Beyoncé a feminist? Is she a womanist? I don't know. To me she is a cyborg. "Cyborg writing," Donna Haraway tells us, "is about the power to survive, not on the basis of original innocence, but on the basis of seizing the tools to mark the world that marked them as other." What I appreciate about Beyoncé is that I understand and recognize the tools seized. This is not to say that these aspects in Beyoncé align neatly — they are indeed confusing — but they demand a right that is so often denied black women: the right to be a human, a character with many identities, many aspects, attitudes, vulnerabilities, joys, heartbreaks and realities. This is why, in many ways, the best and the most important videos on Beyonce's new album aren't the ones where she shows her perfected flesh while blithely singing that pretty hurts; they are instead the series of behind-the-scenes videos called the "Self-Titled" features where she shows us how she constructs her music, her package, her production. This is where she explains how she breastfed her daughter while in the studio, expresses her deep respect and devotion to her mother and sister and talks about her unbridled desire for her husband as a young wife. Twenty years ago, Donna Haraway wrote in her "Cyborg Manifesto" that she would rather be a cyborg than a goddess. She also wrote that "women of colour might be understood as a cyborg identity, a potent subjectivity synthesized from fusions of outsider identities." If Beyoncé, who wears her engagement ring over a robotic glove in her "Single Ladies" video, doesn't embody this sort of fusion, I don't know who does. Women like her, Tina Turner and Josephine Baker show us the necessity of constantly remastering how you are seen by others, how you are understood, and, in the choreography of that dance of dominance and submission, they show us that the performance of a lifetime is one that you must do in the world, in practice and not just in theory, with all eyes on you.
So here is one more moment from that show in Chicago, at United Center, where Michael Jordan once soared across the court and made millions of boys and girls believe they could do something mythic and magical: Beyoncé was attached to a holster by members of her all-female band and lifted into the sky. The crowd sighed. In a blue sequined jumpsuit with blond hair that makes her look like them and yet still totally ours, Beyoncé set soar. The white man in front of me started to fan himself. It was indeed surreal. The Queen Bee had made the stadium into her hive, turned her skeptics into believers, and made everyone go hoarse singing her anthems: "If I Were a Boy," "Survivor," "Run The World (Girls)." I am not a Beyoncé fan but I felt like crying tears of joy all three times I saw the Mrs. Carter show. Because while other pop stars may sing about throwing some glitter on it and making it rain, only Beyoncé could literally soar over us, climb up over our heads and our real lives, climb over her kingdom, to actually throw down over us what looks like bits of pollen, golden confetti, and make it rain bits of her dream all over her fans who love her so, and who would do anything for their Queen.

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Educating Inmates- Part II

Visiting people at the county jail felt both familiar and odd. I am still processing. Even after hanging with Nicole S. afterwards to talk and process together, I am still sifting through the many layers of this experience.

Having visited jails/prison before, I have never been allowed outside the visitor's area. Family has described the inner workings and tv has filled in colorful gaps. But nothing felt the way it did today. I can see how some of the monotony and predictability of a typical day might become comforting to people. I can also see how our humanity is bared and stripped away. There is countless research on the impact of dulling our senses to the point of numbness. It's how I felt today. No color. No variation in textures. No real human interaction or contact. No grass or trees or nature. The survival mode and mentality you would have to exhibit is unfathomable, yet millions accomplish it every day.

How would I break through that mindset upon the release of an inmate their first few minutes reclaiming their freedom? What programs or services would I offer to them in the parking lot?

Nothing. I wouldn't.

My experience has been that reconnecting with the world, the sensory overload, physical exhaustion, new routine, and emotional baggage is too much to overcome in that moment. Like the possible college courses being proposed in NY, in theory the people being released should have been educated and rehabilitated while incarcerated. Upon exiting, they would have the choice to go in the direction of insanity or the direction of new hope. *The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, producing the same results and outcomes.

No, I personally would not focus on the inmate. I would focus on their family. A consistent theme I heard today was that we need to get to the kids as early possible. To me that means infancy. Numerous studies show that as infants we crave and need human contact, affection, and love to survive and thrive.  If you aren't getting those things, you are already off to a rocky start, missing out on developmental milestones and the ability to feel compassion and empathy. The mother in me wants to help the kids.

When the ex-prisoner walks out the doors, personal affects in hand, they would be greeted by their children.  They would have the opportunity to talk together with a counselor who would explain several options for the children. Together, the parents and children would decide on a "camp" for the child to attend. Then, the children would be shuttled to one of these camps for an intense experience where they were taught tools. Coping mechanisms, communication, self-discovery, personal well being and health, conflict mediation, anger management, compassion and more would be topics taught through classroom instruction, journaling, meditation, a ropes course, community service, and counseling. I don't want to treat the symptom (parents in prison), I want to break the cycle.

To be Nevada-specific, this "camp" would take place up in Tahoe and be a year long, fully functioning facility, with kids coming and going throughout the year. We'd have to time it right and make allowances for missing school, maybe incorporating school work so they wouldn't fall behind. And it would range in age, 5-24. I say 24 because that is the cut off for insurance under the affordable care act, and this treatment would be subsidized by insurance.

So, let's review:
1. Prisoner is released, walks out to the parking lot to be greeted by family and their children.
2. After some private time, a counselor from the camp would talk about the different options/tracks with the families. Together, the families would decide length of stay and which track the kids would take.
3. The kids would get on a bus and head to camp. The parent, now a free man or woman, would go do whatever it was they were going to do. Maybe they would seek out their next hit. Maybe they would go on to college. I can't say, but at least they would know there was hope for their children.

I choose this as a possible solution because I don't believe there is a one-size fits all program that would successfully address each prisoner's individual situations. And I think you have to start small and start somewhere. So I would start with those who have kids. Once we could show success, expansion of the program could be a possibility.

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Educating Inmates- Part I



What a timely article!

*Part I of this blog includes a few thoughts on the article. Part II will include views after having visited jail on Thursday.

According to the article, the state of New York (NY) used to pay for college classes for inmates until the 1990s when funds were no longer available to support the program. After reading through the article and comments, I can see both sides of the argument. The educator in me wins out, voting to support paying for classes for inmates. http://www.npr.org/2014/03/11/288689537/n-y-governor-says-college-for-inmates-will-pay-off-for-taxpayers

Different Offenses
I don’t pretend to understand our legal system. From other articles and news stories I’ve watched or read, it seems there are people in prison for minor misdemeanors or petty crimes who would greatly benefit from more education. Rehabilitation for them is a real opportunity. But the stigma of being an ex-prisoner may be a permanent block to their successes upon completion of their sentences.  People in the wrong place at the wrong time, people wrongly convicted, those who didn’t pay child support, and others who were first-time offenders could be productive, contributing, tax-paying members of society again.

The Alternative
What’s the alternative? A person goes to jail, sits for years doing nothing productive, and emerges with no skills or ability to take care of themselves. I don’t understand how that continues to be acceptable. These are people who affect our community. I would rather they be able to get a job than go back to whatever landed them in prison to begin with.

The Money
It has been my experience, that people who identify as conservative are very fiscally minded. Which is why I am surprised that not more conservatives support funding the initial cost of educating inmates to the continued cost of housing and feeding repeat offenders.

Silly Fallacies
One argument brought forth in the comments of the article said that now students will see going to prison as their only chance of getting a free education. This is silly. And a fallacy. A silly fallacy to be exact. Committing a crime does not guarantee that you will end up in a facility that offers you a free college education. Sure, it’s free housing, but a cell does not make a home. You have no freedoms. Free meals? Not super nutritious or tasty. At least not at the last prison where I visited family.  Free education? There are a number of ways to get a free education. I don’t see kids lining up to commit crimes so they can go prison for an education. The money the state would save in the long run could be funneled back into education. And it doesn’t have to be free, the inmates ould work it off or do some sort of payback program when they become gainfully employed.

Finland
I love me some Finland. Seriously. We have talked ad nauseam about ways to move to Finland. They require that you actively learn Finnish, have a sizeable amount of savings, and have proof that you have a job before they’ll even grant you a temporary visa. They don’t get much sun, but they are some of the happiest people on the planet, leading the world in education, sustainability, and well-being. Their rates of recidivism are also low when compared with the US. They don’t cage their inmates like animals. They are some of the most humane prisons on Earth. And safest. Just a thought. (http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/09/why-scandinavian-prisons-are-superior/279949/)  



N.Y. Governor Says College For Inmates Will Pay Off For Taxpayers



America used to have a robust college education system for prison inmates. It was seen as a way to rehabilitate men and women behind bars by helping them go straight when they got out.
Those taxpayer-funded college classes were defunded in the 1990s. But New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo would like to bring them back in the state, prompting a fierce new debate over higher education in state prisons.
Things have become so heated that a reporter even evoked Mark David Chapman, the man who murdered John Lennon, in a question to Cuomo this month in Buffalo, N.Y. "What do you say to a Yoko Ono if Mark David Chapman says, 'I want a college education?' " the reporter asked.
Cuomo, a Democrat, says reinstating taxpayer-funded college classes in New York's prisons is a common-sense plan that will reduce the number of inmates who commit new crimes.
"Forget nice; let's talk about self-interest," Cuomo responded. "You pay $60,000 for a prison cell for a year. You put a guy away for 10 years, that's 600 grand. Right now, chances are almost half, that once he's released, he's going to come right back."
Cuomo says helping inmates get a college education would cost about $5,000 a year per person — chump change, he argues, if it keeps that inmate from bouncing back into prison.
But even some members of the governor's own party hate this idea. State Assemblywoman Addie Russell, whose upstate district includes three state prisons, says taxpayers just won't stand for inmates getting a free college education, while middle-class families struggle to pay for their kids' tuition, housing and books.
"That is the vast majority of feedback that I'm also getting from my constituents," she says. "You know, 'Where is the relief for the rest of the law-abiding population?' "
If this argument sounds familiar, the fight here in New York is a carbon copy of the national debate over prison education programs 20 years ago.
In 1994, President Clinton pushed through a tough crime bill that dramatically expanded America's prison system, while also eliminating federal student aid programs for inmates.

"There must be no doubt about whose side we're on," Clinton argued. "People who commit crimes should be caught, convicted and punished. This bill puts government on the side of those who abide by the law, not those who break it."
It was a victory for the tough-on-crime movement, but many prison experts now say dismantling inmate education programs was misguided.
"I was very disappointed that the policy had been changed," says Gerald Gaes, who served as an expert on college programs for the Federal Bureau of Prisons in the 1990s. He has since written extensively on the impact of higher education behind bars.
Gaes says research shows that college classes actually save taxpayers money over time, by reducing the number of inmates who break the law and wind up back in those expensive prison cells.
"It is cost-effective," he says. "Designing prisons that way will have a long-term benefit for New York state."
by the RAND Corporation and the Department of Justice also found that participants in prison education programs, including GED education, college courses and other types of training, were less likely to return to prison after their release.
Bipartisan critics in New York's Legislature have promised to kill Cuomo's proposal, with one lawmaker describing it as "Club Med" for inmates.
But the plan plays very differently with black and Hispanic lawmakers, who have pushed for prison reforms. Cuomo drew a standing ovation in February when he spoke to a largely black church congregation in Albany.
"Let's use common sense, the economic cost, the human cost — let's invest and rehabilitate people so they have a future," . "That's what works."
With New York's budget due next month, Cuomo says he hopes to fund college classes in 10 prisons as a trial program. He's had success in the past pushing controversial ideas that seemed dead on arrival, including same-sex marriage in 2011 and a strict gun control law last year.

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Higher Learning



Spoiler Alert: If you have not watched Higher Learning, you may want to wait to read this post.

The first time I watched Higher Learning was in high school. I was at a friend’s house and we rented it from a video store. Video stores….brick and mortar buildings filled with rows and rows of movies and over-priced candy. And if you went on Tuesdays, it was $0.99 to rent any movie! Otherwise, the new releases cost more.

I remember being confused while watching the movie; not quite understanding some of the scenes and language. I was also terrified of going to college.  My parents, never ones to actually monitor what I was watching at any age, assured me that nothing was going to happen in college the way it did in the movie.

I didn’t watch the movie again until I got to college.  I came across it in a bin of used movies and picked it up thinking that it was a good movie. While not as traumatizing as American History X, Higher Learning still had an effect on me. Watching it in college with my roommates was a very different experience. Things that didn’t make sense years earlier, were suddenly clear and in focus.  And my parents were wrong. Shootings, hate, binge drinking, fighting, rape, and sexual assault did happen on college campuses.  They didn’t happen to me, but I was affected nonetheless and often was called upon to support others.  As an RA, this movie was pulled out again and again for movie nights and discussions before it was packed away.

Here we are again, dusting the movie off and watching it with the intent to dissect different identities of the characters as they evolved in the movie. Watching the movie now I see the people and the situations very differently.  As a student affairs professional, I wince at all of the liability issues present in most of the scenes. As a person who is becoming better educated about race and power, I am enraged at the behavior of the campus police officers. There is not one scene where the police officers actually do their job appropriately.  One place where my original feelings have not changed involves Michael Rapaport’s character Remy.

Every time I see this movie, I cry over Remy. My compassion grows for him each time I watch his self-destruction. Like so many of our students, Remy came from an abusive home. He had dreams of becoming an architect or engineer. He experienced culture shock, moving from a small town in the mid-west to a sprawling urban campus in California. Remy just wanted to belong. He wanted friends and to be understood.  I want to reach into the screen and shake people when they walk away from him or ignore him.  I remind my own student staff constantly that all it takes is one smile, one kind word, or one friendly greeting to make a person’s day. That has never been truer than in Remy’s case.  It makes me sad, that there are some students who have no self-confidence, and are one bad experience away from committing suicide. Remy was smart. He probably suffered from a learning disability or social anxiety. He was easy prey for the wrong group and in some ways, exactly who the white supremacists seek out. Remy was lonely and impressionable, quick to blindly trust in anyone who would believe in him and nurture him. Remy was not full of hate the way the ring leader of the group was. He was not manipulative or controlling. He was hurting. And unfortunately, he only saw one way out of it. I bawl like a baby every time I watch Remy and hear him say, “I’m sorry. I only wanted to build stuff”.  That scene affects me so much, that I can’t watch other work Michael Rapaport has done without tearing up and thinking of Remy. He was a kid who never got to actualize his full potential and become a positive, contributing member of society.

In contrast, Ice Cube’s character Fudge cracks me up. When we meet him in the movie, he already has a very deep sense of self. One would hope so after being on campus for six or more years! Fudge is comfortable in his own skin and has a strong identity. He understands the systems that “control” him on campus and in this country.  What I find interesting about his character, is that he doesn’t try to educate everyone else on race, history, privilege or power. He’s not organizing book clubs or movie nights. He doesn’t hold weekly discussions or push people to study ethnic programs. Fudge mocks people. His sarcasm, whether subtle or overt, is effortless.  He gets away with saying the unthinkable. And when he chooses to call people out, his words are swift and strong. No one questions him.  Every interaction Fudge has with the police is filmed in such a way as to bring comic relief to the harsh subject matter, but each scene still rings with truth. When being followed by the police and asked for his ID, Fudge whips out a flashlight and asks for their badge numbers. When called a gang member outside of the fraternity house and again asked for ID, Fudge retorts that they (the police and students) know he is a student. How could they not? He’s been there quite a while. When gathered after Remy pulls a gun on his roommate and Malik, the police ask them to disperse. Fudge refuses, saying if the White students can stand together so can they (the Black students).  Irony was never so funny as when you learned that Fudge’s last name is White. Because Fudge is so complete in his identity, it is fitting that he graduates at the end.

The protagonists of the movie are Omar Epp’s character Malik Williams, and Kristy Swanson’s character Kristen Connor.  I could write for days on them! So much material! In the interest of keeping it simple, let’s look at them both briefly.  Malik and Kristen meet in an elevator where Kristen grabs her purse close for fear he may try to rob her. In the end, they meet at the statue where Malik’s girlfriend Deja died.  In the middle, a whole lot happens! In an effort to do as I promised and try to keep it brief, let’s use Chickering’s 7 vectors of Identity Development (http://studentdevelopmenttheory.wordpress.com/chickerings-seven-vectors/)
to frame their individual growth in the movie.  

Vector 1 Developing competence
Kristen may have been book smart, but she had a ways to go for learning how to be competent in social settings and when interacting with peers. She seemed to be strong when she left her friends at a party because she didn’t want drink, but she left alone and was walking alone at night. She was smart to ask Billy to use a condom, but when he continued and raped her, she was not emotionally competent enough to report it or see a doctor.

Malik was smart enough to get into college, but let his ego get in the way of track practice the first day. His naivety at being a star almost cost him his scholarship. Further, he had problems in the classroom and his first papers were horrid.  

Vector 2 Managing Emotions
Malik never fully mastered managing his emotions. He was quick to anger, never taking time to just breathe and evaluate the situation he was in. He acted in impulse. This may have been a result of his upbringing. He did become better at expressing himself in his classwork.

Kristen’s sexual assault rendered her almost powerless. She was at a loss for how to move forward in relationships, but she sought out friendships and joined clubs.

Vector 3 Moving through autonomy to interdependence
I found that Kristen struggled with this more than Malik. Malik seemed to build relationships fairly easily. Kristen really struggled with her sexual identity. I tend to think even if the assault had not occurred; she may have still experimented and tried a same sex relationship.  This was not resolved to me. If anything, Kristen became selfish and was dating two people at the same time without telling the other.  She put herself and her partners at risk for STDs and STIs.

Vector 4 Developing mature interpersonal relationships
Kristen came to see how she could appreciate people who are different from her. I don’t believe Malik reached that place. He never really tried to get to know Remy or mediate their relationship.  Kristen took it upon herself to try to do something, anything. Her involvement in the peace rally and the take back the night rally pushed her to step outside her comfort zone and reach out to people.  Malik couldn’t bring himself to even open up to his roommate. He did confront him on keeping their room clean and keeping music down when sleeping. They worked out their differences, and got along, but when his roommate approached him about why Malik was moving out, Malik only gave vague answers about needing to be with his people.

Vector 5 Establishing Identity
I’m not sure either Kristen or Malik ever achieved vector 5. I think they were well on their way, but were set back by Remy’s actions.

Vector 6 Developing Purpose
Kristen seemed to develop a purpose. She wanted to help people, heal their campus, and bring people together.  Speaking out as a victim of assault and taking a stand on violence gave her a sense of purpose. Malik on the other hand, could not see past the immediate issues of racism he encountered daily. The instances did not serve as a motivation to develop a purpose, but more served as reasons to feel his violent responses were justified. His professor was reaching through to him, making him see how he could use these experiences. His girlfriend tried to talk to him as well, encouraging him to use his talent to get ahead and stop worrying about what other thought of him.

Vector 7 Developing Integrity
At the very end, when Malik is running down the quad/sidewalk, I think he found his integrity. He had contemplated dropping out of school, but this one shot of him running says to me, he decided to stay in school.  Malik also encouraged Kristen to not feel guilt about organizing the peace rally, saying that you can’t blame yourself for other’s actions. Kristen on the other hand, was feeling guilty and remorseful. She believed the shooting was her fault, instead of accepting that it was beyond her control.